작성자 핸드오프 QA

콘텐츠 브리프 QA 체크리스트

작업 시작 전 브리프가 키워드, 의도, 구조, 출처, 링크, CTA, 납품 지침을 충분히 제공하는지 확인합니다.

브리프 보강 필요0/100
완료021
누락21
핸드오프 누락0
가장 약한 그룹0%Keywords and intent

브리프 설정

과제 맥락을 정의한 뒤 브리프에 실제 포함된 항목을 확인하세요.

Keywords and intent

0/5

Structure

0/4

Evidence

0/4

Links and conversion

0/4

Writer handoff

0/4

그룹 점수

Keywords and intent
0%
Structure
0%
Evidence
0%
Links and conversion
0%
Writer handoff
0%

보고서 미리보기

# Content Brief QA Checklist

Brief: Untitled brief
Content type: article
Writer type: in-house
Readiness: needs-briefing
Score: 0/100
Completed: 0/21

## Checklist

### Keywords and intent
- [ ] Primary keyword - Does the brief name one primary keyword or search topic?
- [ ] Secondary keywords - Are secondary keywords, entities, or subtopics listed without turning the brief into keyword stuffing?
- [ ] Search intent - Does the brief define the expected search intent and page format?
- [ ] Audience defined - Does the writer know who the reader is and what decision they need to make?
- [ ] Angle and promise - Does the brief explain the page angle, promise, or point of view?

### Structure
- [ ] Outline headings - Does the brief include the expected H1/H2/H3 structure?
- [ ] Required sections - Are must-have sections, examples, tables, FAQs, or comparison blocks specified?
- [ ] Depth boundaries - Does the brief explain what to cover deeply and what to avoid?
- [ ] Word count range - Is there a useful word count range or section-level depth guide?

### Evidence
- [ ] Source requirements - Does the brief specify source quality, citation rules, and unsupported-claim limits?
- [ ] Competitor references - Does the brief show what competing pages cover and where this page should be better?
- [ ] Brand expertise - Does the writer have internal data, product notes, expert quotes, or first-hand proof to use?
- [ ] Fact and claim rules - Are claims, statistics, comparisons, and YMYL statements controlled?

### Links and conversion
- [ ] Internal links - Does the brief include target internal links and anchor guidance?
- [ ] External links - Does the brief define when external links are required or forbidden?
- [ ] CTA defined - Is the target CTA or next step clear?
- [ ] Metadata brief - Does the writer need to draft title, meta description, OG copy, or FAQ/schema notes?

### Writer handoff
- [ ] Tone and style - Does the brief define tone, brand voice, formatting, and reading level?
- [ ] Submission format - Does the writer know the delivery format and naming rules?
- [ ] Review criteria - Are acceptance criteria and reviewer responsibilities clear?
- [ ] Asset requirements - Does the brief explain image, screenshot, table, chart, or downloadable asset needs?

## Missing priorities
- Search intent: State whether the page should be informational, commercial, transactional, comparison, or support-led.
- Source requirements: Add source requirements, minimum evidence count, allowed source types, and fact-checking rules.
- Primary keyword: Add one primary keyword, target URL, and the page that should win for the query.
- Outline headings: Provide a scannable outline with required heading levels and logical section order.
- Required sections: List required sections and call out any table, FAQ, proof, or comparison block that must appear.
- Internal links: List required internal links, preferred anchors, and pages that should not be cannibalized.