Writer handoff QA
Content Brief QA Checklist
Make sure a brief gives writers enough keyword, intent, structure, source, link, CTA, and delivery guidance before work starts.
Needs briefing0/100
Completed021
Missing21
Handoff gaps0
Weakest group0%Keywords and intent
Brief setup
Define the assignment context, then check what is actually included in the brief.
Keywords and intent
0/5Structure
0/4Evidence
0/4Links and conversion
0/4Writer handoff
0/4Group scores
Keywords and intent
0%
Structure
0%
Evidence
0%
Links and conversion
0%
Writer handoff
0%
Report preview
# Content Brief QA Checklist Brief: Untitled brief Content type: article Writer type: in-house Readiness: needs-briefing Score: 0/100 Completed: 0/21 ## Checklist ### Keywords and intent - [ ] Primary keyword - Does the brief name one primary keyword or search topic? - [ ] Secondary keywords - Are secondary keywords, entities, or subtopics listed without turning the brief into keyword stuffing? - [ ] Search intent - Does the brief define the expected search intent and page format? - [ ] Audience defined - Does the writer know who the reader is and what decision they need to make? - [ ] Angle and promise - Does the brief explain the page angle, promise, or point of view? ### Structure - [ ] Outline headings - Does the brief include the expected H1/H2/H3 structure? - [ ] Required sections - Are must-have sections, examples, tables, FAQs, or comparison blocks specified? - [ ] Depth boundaries - Does the brief explain what to cover deeply and what to avoid? - [ ] Word count range - Is there a useful word count range or section-level depth guide? ### Evidence - [ ] Source requirements - Does the brief specify source quality, citation rules, and unsupported-claim limits? - [ ] Competitor references - Does the brief show what competing pages cover and where this page should be better? - [ ] Brand expertise - Does the writer have internal data, product notes, expert quotes, or first-hand proof to use? - [ ] Fact and claim rules - Are claims, statistics, comparisons, and YMYL statements controlled? ### Links and conversion - [ ] Internal links - Does the brief include target internal links and anchor guidance? - [ ] External links - Does the brief define when external links are required or forbidden? - [ ] CTA defined - Is the target CTA or next step clear? - [ ] Metadata brief - Does the writer need to draft title, meta description, OG copy, or FAQ/schema notes? ### Writer handoff - [ ] Tone and style - Does the brief define tone, brand voice, formatting, and reading level? - [ ] Submission format - Does the writer know the delivery format and naming rules? - [ ] Review criteria - Are acceptance criteria and reviewer responsibilities clear? - [ ] Asset requirements - Does the brief explain image, screenshot, table, chart, or downloadable asset needs? ## Missing priorities - Search intent: State whether the page should be informational, commercial, transactional, comparison, or support-led. - Source requirements: Add source requirements, minimum evidence count, allowed source types, and fact-checking rules. - Primary keyword: Add one primary keyword, target URL, and the page that should win for the query. - Outline headings: Provide a scannable outline with required heading levels and logical section order. - Required sections: List required sections and call out any table, FAQ, proof, or comparison block that must appear. - Internal links: List required internal links, preferred anchors, and pages that should not be cannibalized.